<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can&#8217;t I do Church on the Internet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/</link>
	<description>Reclaiming the biblical model of church as body</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:49:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: megan fox</title>
		<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>megan fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Sign: umsun Hello!!! rcuwwymhyw and 8874ssgfhphzye and 8570Great Blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sign: umsun Hello!!! rcuwwymhyw and 8874ssgfhphzye and 8570Great Blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandrar</title>
		<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-684</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best CreditCard</title>
		<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Best CreditCard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>I was lucky enough o get my credit card information stolen. My credit history was messed up. It took me awhile to solve the problem. After that I didn’t want to use credit cards online because I didn’t want to screw everything up again. Now I need a new one and I’m thinking about applying for one at
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://faster-carda.cn/discovery-credit-chase-card.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chase discovery credit card&lt;/a&gt;
 
Ne72Ma9rod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was lucky enough o get my credit card information stolen. My credit history was messed up. It took me awhile to solve the problem. After that I didn’t want to use credit cards online because I didn’t want to screw everything up again. Now I need a new one and I’m thinking about applying for one at</p>
<p><a href="http://faster-carda.cn/discovery-credit-chase-card.html" rel="nofollow">chase discovery credit card</a></p>
<p>Ne72Ma9rod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Campbell</title>
		<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I believe the scripture indicates that the people in whom the writer was writing to were in the habit of not getting together with other followers of Christ. I didn&#039;t get the impression from Mr. Robison&#039;s comments that he was suggesting that people should not assemble. 

He did say, &quot;without feeling compelled to “meet” in a formal meeting.&quot; There are many today who do in fact feel compelled and put upon to &quot;meet&quot; and the reality of the situtation is that it ends up serving to build up the institutional church more than to build up the true body of Christ. 

We should however look at the intention of the gathering. When Christ is in fact allowed to be the Head of the gathering than the intention of the gathering is much different. If we look at His examples of gathering they are very sporadic, but they had a purpose. I believe what Mr. Robison is saying is that we should leave Christ in charge of how He prefers to gather His sheep rather. 

I do believe that scripture speaks of the &quot;local church&quot; but probably not the way that we have interpreted it. The local church was most likely not a defined group that clung to each other and the doctrines that they had formed. But I must say that building relationships is important, more often than none Christ did this one on one with people. 

I like what Zane said, “Some assembly reqired,” This is so very true. We also must remember that as creatures given to the flesh we need to rely on Him for that assembling, because when we put it together ourselves it doesn&#039;t look like the Body that He prefers. This is an important part of really trusting Christ as the Head of the Body. Do we trust Him to determine when, where and with whom we should gather or do we trust ourselves more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the scripture indicates that the people in whom the writer was writing to were in the habit of not getting together with other followers of Christ. I didn&#8217;t get the impression from Mr. Robison&#8217;s comments that he was suggesting that people should not assemble. </p>
<p>He did say, &#8220;without feeling compelled to “meet” in a formal meeting.&#8221; There are many today who do in fact feel compelled and put upon to &#8220;meet&#8221; and the reality of the situtation is that it ends up serving to build up the institutional church more than to build up the true body of Christ. </p>
<p>We should however look at the intention of the gathering. When Christ is in fact allowed to be the Head of the gathering than the intention of the gathering is much different. If we look at His examples of gathering they are very sporadic, but they had a purpose. I believe what Mr. Robison is saying is that we should leave Christ in charge of how He prefers to gather His sheep rather. </p>
<p>I do believe that scripture speaks of the &#8220;local church&#8221; but probably not the way that we have interpreted it. The local church was most likely not a defined group that clung to each other and the doctrines that they had formed. But I must say that building relationships is important, more often than none Christ did this one on one with people. </p>
<p>I like what Zane said, “Some assembly reqired,” This is so very true. We also must remember that as creatures given to the flesh we need to rely on Him for that assembling, because when we put it together ourselves it doesn&#8217;t look like the Body that He prefers. This is an important part of really trusting Christ as the Head of the Body. Do we trust Him to determine when, where and with whom we should gather or do we trust ourselves more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zane anderson</title>
		<link>http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>zane anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bodychurch.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/cant-i-do-church-on-the-internet/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeremy.  I tend to agree that there is a little over-reaction going on here. So much of the NT content is not only in the context of intentional meetings but would require such gatherings as opposed to accidental happenings. &quot;Church&quot;, in fact, means intentional gathering. Several times we read: when you come together...

Besides, there is a direct mandate not to forsake the assembling together.

&quot;Some assembly reqired,&quot; I say.

God bless you, brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeremy.  I tend to agree that there is a little over-reaction going on here. So much of the NT content is not only in the context of intentional meetings but would require such gatherings as opposed to accidental happenings. &#8220;Church&#8221;, in fact, means intentional gathering. Several times we read: when you come together&#8230;</p>
<p>Besides, there is a direct mandate not to forsake the assembling together.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some assembly reqired,&#8221; I say.</p>
<p>God bless you, brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
